Contested Reactions to Field Marshal's Meeting with Shia Scholars

A detailed summary of the controversy surrounding a meeting between a Field Marshal and Shia scholars, organized by Tehreek-e-Inteshar and Wahdat-ul-Muslimeen. The piece notes that most critics were not invited, and among those who attended, some have distanced themselves from the path of Ahl-e-Bait and appear aligned with divisive elements. The first objection claims the Field Marshal's statement that 'Whoever does not love Pakistan should leave for the country they are loyal to' was unfairly linked to Iran or the Shia community, arguing the remark was not aimed at any sect or country but at all those who repeatedly shift loyalties across identities for personal agendas. The second objection asserts they were not given a chance to speak; in reality, the interaction lasted over an hour with open questions and answers, followed by an iftar dinner that extended another hour, during which the Field Marshal remained engaged. Despite this, critics who were absent allege denial of opportunity. The piece concludes that the broader campaign reveals a troubling contradiction: public concern for one side while promoting narratives that align with external adversarial interests.